Granger vs Mishawaka

Which is the better fit for you?

Granger, IN
78
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Mishawaka, IN
67
Area Score
Top 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Granger receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Granger to Mishawaka

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 91.4 against 91.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,292 in Mishawaka against $1,292 in Granger.
The median home
53% less
$155,500 in Mishawaka against $331,100 in Granger.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 17°F in Mishawaka against 17°F in Granger; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Granger
Mishawaka
Opportunity: Granger is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
74 · Top 16%
vs
59 · Top 45%
Growth: Granger is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
64 · Top 23%
vs
42 · Bottom 31%
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
61 · Bottom 17%
Physical resilience
95 · Top 4%
vs
95 · Top 3%
Housing affordability: Granger is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 21%
vs
75 · Top 26%
Schools: Granger is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
84 · Top 8%
vs
61 · Top 35%
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Granger is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
44 · Bottom 27%

Measured values

MetricGrangerMishawakaSource period
Population30,32151,0212024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$123,318 — more favorable$54,2912024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$57,489 — more favorable$34,4692024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,234/sq mi2,819/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$331,100$155,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,656$1,070 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,292$1,292FY2026
Cost of living index91.491.42023
Homeownership rate95.3%49.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%4.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.1%+1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher56.3% — more favorable29.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.5% — more favorable15.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)92610012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.4 — more favorable2.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+26.7%−70.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F17°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.2"39.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.5 min ±1.1 min22.6 min ±0.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.436.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7172024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.916.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency80.1% — more favorable49.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency78.1% — more favorable58.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility26.3%37.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Granger
—
Granger: Your Score
78
Area Score
Mishawaka
—
Mishawaka: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Granger, IN · Mishawaka, IN · How this is calculated: methodology