Grand Haven vs Wyoming

Which is the better fit for you?

Grand Haven, MI
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Wyoming, MI
58
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Grand Haven receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Grand Haven to Wyoming

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.0 against 95.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$12 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,531 in Wyoming against $1,519 in Grand Haven.
The median home
10% less
$225,200 in Wyoming against $250,100 in Grand Haven.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 19°F in Wyoming against 21°F in Grand Haven; July highs are 83°F against 82°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Grand Haven
Wyoming
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 14%
vs
37 · Bottom 13%
Growth: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
46 · Bottom 40%
vs
52 · Top 47%
Climate: Grand Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
64 · Bottom 30%
vs
62 · Bottom 22%
Physical resilience: Grand Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
95 · Top 3%
vs
94 · Top 6%
Housing affordability: Grand Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
71 · Top 37%
vs
70 · Top 39%
Schools: Grand Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
82 · Top 9%
vs
22 · Bottom 15%
Access: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Access
81 · Bottom 22%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
45 · Bottom 28%
vs
64 · Top 38%

Measured values

MetricGrand HavenWyomingSource period
Population10,99677,3532024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$60,669$73,677 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$40,528 — more favorable$35,3462024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,921/sq mi3,127/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$250,100$225,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$939 — more favorable$1,1962024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,519 — more favorable$1,531FY2026
Cost of living index95.095.02023
Homeownership rate68.3%67.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1% — more favorable4.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−6.2%−5.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher36.7% — more favorable25.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.6% ±6%10.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3032612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.74.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+15.4%+31.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.1"39.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport37 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute18.6 min — more favorable22.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age46.834.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools11302024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.5 — more favorable16.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.3% — more favorable23.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency69.4% — more favorable35.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility35.9%84.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Grand Haven
—
Grand Haven: Your Score
64
Area Score
Wyoming
—
Wyoming: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Grand Haven, MI · Wyoming, MI · How this is calculated: methodology