Grafton vs Sussex

Which is the better fit for you?

Grafton, WI
76
Area Score
Top 3% nationally
Sussex, WI
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sussex receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Grafton to Sussex

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.7 against 95.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,338 in Sussex against $1,338 in Grafton.
The median home
31% more
$430,600 in Sussex against $328,800 in Grafton.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 17°F in Sussex against 17°F in Grafton; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Grafton
Sussex
Opportunity: Sussex is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
76 · Top 14%
vs
78 · Top 11%
Growth: Grafton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
61 · Top 28%
vs
59 · Top 30%
Climate
61 · Bottom 18%
vs
61 · Bottom 18%
Physical resilience: Grafton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
97 · Top 2%
vs
96 · Top 3%
Housing affordability: Sussex is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 21%
vs
80 · Top 12%
Schools: Grafton is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
84 · Top 8%
vs
82 · Top 10%
Access
70 · Bottom 12%
vs
70 · Bottom 11%
Economic stability: Sussex is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
76 · Top 10%
vs
81 · Top 3%

Measured values

MetricGraftonSussexSource period
Population12,44512,0662024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$89,861$119,041 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$47,360$60,001 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,335/sq mi1,428/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$328,800$430,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,310 ±$141$1,369 ±$702024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,338$1,338FY2026
Cost of living index95.795.72023
Homeownership rate61.3%70.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable+0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate47.2% ±4%51.2% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate3.9% ±1%4.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1078612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.6 — more favorable7.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−63.2%−15.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F17°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.6"34.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport55 mi — more favorable56 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.2 min ±2.0 min25.9 min ±1.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.539.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools462024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.7 — more favorable16.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency62.3% — more favorable60.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.6%64.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility15.6%11.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Grafton
—
Grafton: Your Score
76
Area Score
Sussex
—
Sussex: Your Score
77
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Grafton, WI · Sussex, WI · How this is calculated: methodology