Glenn Dale vs Peabody

Which is the better fit for you?

Glenn Dale, MD
53
Area Score
Bottom 29% nationally
Peabody, MA
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Peabody receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Glenn Dale to Peabody

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 110.4 against 109.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
10% more
$596,200 in Peabody against $542,000 in Glenn Dale.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F colder
Normal January lows are 20°F in Peabody against 25°F in Glenn Dale; July highs are 82°F against 89°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

37 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Glenn Dale
Peabody
Opportunity: Peabody is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
44 · Bottom 24%
vs
49 · Bottom 34%
Growth: Peabody is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
25 · Bottom 9%
vs
28 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Glenn Dale is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 36%
vs
63 · Bottom 27%
Physical resilience: Peabody is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
76 · Top 30%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability: Glenn Dale is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
46 · Bottom 16%
vs
41 · Bottom 10%
Schools: Peabody is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
27 · Bottom 21%
vs
39 · Bottom 35%
Access: Peabody is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 38%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Glenn Dale is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 3%
vs
73 · Top 16%

Measured values

MetricGlenn DalePeabodySource period
Population13,77254,6952024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$134,333 — more favorable$96,6572024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$58,136 — more favorable$51,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,925/sq mi3,369/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$542,000$596,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,698 ±$348$1,950 ±$992024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index109.5 — more favorable110.42023
Homeownership rate87.8%65.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7% — more favorable4.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.6%−1.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher51.2% — more favorable35.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate2.1% — more favorable7.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,8731712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable0.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−29.9%−39.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.0"44.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute37.3 min28.3 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.445.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1102024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.712.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency20.9%42.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency35.8%46.2%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Maryland and Massachusetts do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Glenn Dale

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Peabody

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Glenn Dale
—
Glenn Dale: Your Score
53
Area Score
Peabody
—
Peabody: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Glenn Dale, MD · Peabody, MA · How this is calculated: methodology