Glen Carbon vs Shiloh

Which is the better fit for you?

Glen Carbon, IL
67
Area Score
Top 21% nationally
Shiloh, IL
65
Area Score
Top 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Glen Carbon receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Glen Carbon to Shiloh

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.0 against 95.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$120 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,220 in Shiloh against $1,340 in Glen Carbon.
The median home
3% less
$274,000 in Shiloh against $282,000 in Glen Carbon.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 24°F in Shiloh against 24°F in Glen Carbon; July highs are 90°F against 89°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Glen Carbon
Shiloh
Opportunity: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
76 · Top 13%
vs
72 · Top 20%
Growth: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
55 · Top 40%
vs
52 · Top 45%
Climate: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 40%
vs
71 · Top 46%
Physical resilience: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
60 · Top 48%
vs
43 · Bottom 34%
Housing affordability: Shiloh is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 10%
vs
89 · Top 2%
Schools: Shiloh is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
41 · Bottom 39%
vs
47 · Bottom 47%
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
67 · Top 31%

Measured values

MetricGlen CarbonShilohSource period
Population13,97714,5722024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$97,168 ±$11,182$99,573 ±$14,0302024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$51,575 ±$3,789$47,176 ±$3,4612024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,353/sq mi1,165/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$282,000$274,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,097 ±$87$1,187 ±$912024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,340$1,220 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index95.095.02023
Homeownership rate69.2%63.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5% — more favorable3.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8%+0.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher50.8% — more favorable43.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.9% ±3%7.0% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)333212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.4 — more favorable2.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+43.5%+10.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low24°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.8"43.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi4 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.4 min ±2.2 min26.6 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.441.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools262024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.315.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.5%31.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.5%35.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility18.5%54.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Glen Carbon

Elevated or high exposure: hail, earthquake.

Shiloh

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Glen Carbon
—
Glen Carbon: Your Score
67
Area Score
Shiloh
—
Shiloh: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Glen Carbon, IL · Shiloh, IL · How this is calculated: methodology