Glasgow vs Hattiesburg

Which is the better fit for you?

Glasgow, KY
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
Hattiesburg, MS
59
Area Score
Top 49% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hattiesburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Glasgow to Hattiesburg

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Glasgow, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$179 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,047 in Hattiesburg against $868 in Glasgow.
The median home
5% less
$165,900 in Hattiesburg against $173,900 in Glasgow.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Hattiesburg against 27°F in Glasgow; July highs are 92°F against 86°F (summers 6°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Glasgow
Hattiesburg
Opportunity: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
43 · Bottom 22%
vs
58 · Top 46%
Growth: Glasgow is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
57 · Top 36%
vs
42 · Bottom 31%
Climate: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
76 · Top 26%
vs
77 · Top 24%
Physical resilience: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
53 · Bottom 46%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Housing affordability: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
67 · Top 49%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Glasgow is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
62 · Top 33%
vs
61 · Top 35%
Access: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
58 · Bottom 5%
vs
62 · Bottom 7%
Economic stability: Hattiesburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
23 · Bottom 4%
vs
28 · Bottom 8%

Measured values

MetricGlasgowHattiesburgSource period
Population15,19748,6192024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$43,074 ±$6,561$46,342 ±$4,2312024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$30,886 ±$4,449$31,585 ±$3,0292024 ACS 5-Year
Population density943/sq mi910/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$173,900$165,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$849 — more favorable$1,0052024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$868 — more favorable$1,047FY2026
Homeownership rate48.5%37.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.3%3.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.3% — more favorable−0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher22.4%37.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate22.1% ±4%24.5% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)343912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.2 — more favorable0.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−32.0%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F92°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low27°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation53.0"58.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport74 mi65 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute21.5 min18.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.829.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools15192024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.513.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.5%52.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.9%45.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility58.2%76.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kentucky and Mississippi do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Glasgow

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado, earthquake.

Hattiesburg

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Glasgow
—
Glasgow: Your Score
56
Area Score
Hattiesburg
—
Hattiesburg: Your Score
59
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Glasgow, KY · Hattiesburg, MS · How this is calculated: methodology