Gladstone vs Washougal

Which is the better fit for you?

Gladstone, OR
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally
Washougal, WA
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Washougal receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gladstone to Washougal

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 106.7 against 106.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,922 in Washougal against $1,922 in Gladstone.
The median home
15% more
$552,300 in Washougal against $480,700 in Gladstone.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 37°F in Washougal against 36°F in Gladstone; July highs are 82°F against 83°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Gladstone
Washougal
Opportunity: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
57 · Top 47%
Growth: Gladstone is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 36%
vs
35 · Bottom 22%
Climate: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
78 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Gladstone is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
48 · Bottom 40%
vs
41 · Bottom 32%
Housing affordability
55 · Bottom 27%
vs
55 · Bottom 28%
Schools: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 35%
vs
42 · Bottom 40%
Access: Gladstone is the more favorable of the two.
Access
92 · Bottom 48%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
60 · Top 46%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricGladstoneWashougalSource period
Population11,97717,4902024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$91,250 ±$14,943$106,368 ±$8,7462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$49,032 ±$6,026$47,629 ±$4,4722024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,995/sq mi2,939/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$480,700$552,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,740 ±$51$1,701 ±$872024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,922$1,922FY2026
Cost of living index106.7106.72023
Homeownership rate64.6%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7% — more favorable−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate25.8% ±4%28.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.0% ±5%11.7% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,1964212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.8 — more favorable2.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+18.2%−88.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.5"40.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.1 min ±1.9 min27.7 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.838.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools492024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.0 — more favorable19.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency33.1%49.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency58.2%64.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility64.0%42.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Oregon and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gladstone

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Washougal

Elevated or high exposure: volcanic activity.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gladstone
—
Gladstone: Your Score
53
Area Score
Washougal
—
Washougal: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gladstone, OR · Washougal, WA · How this is calculated: methodology