Gastonia vs Waxhaw

Which is the better fit for you?

Gastonia, NC
58
Area Score
Bottom 46% nationally
Waxhaw, NC
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Waxhaw receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gastonia to Waxhaw

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 97.3 against 97.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$589 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,990 in Waxhaw against $1,401 in Gastonia.
The median home
98% more
$549,400 in Waxhaw against $277,600 in Gastonia.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 32°F in Waxhaw against 33°F in Gastonia; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Gastonia
Waxhaw
Opportunity: Waxhaw is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
45 · Bottom 26%
vs
66 · Top 31%
Growth: Gastonia is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 31%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Climate: Waxhaw is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 39%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience: Gastonia is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
66 · Top 42%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: Waxhaw is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 45%
vs
78 · Top 16%
Schools: Waxhaw is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
32 · Bottom 27%
vs
85 · Top 6%
Access: Gastonia is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
90 · Bottom 41%
Economic stability: Waxhaw is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
43 · Bottom 25%
vs
75 · Top 13%

Measured values

MetricGastoniaWaxhawSource period
Population82,88422,2752024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$64,059$131,894 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$35,174$48,910 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,542/sq mi1,827/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$277,600$549,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,204 — more favorable$1,8402024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,401 — more favorable$1,990FY2026
Cost of living index97.397.32023
Homeownership rate54.2%83.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.0%3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8% — more favorable−1.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher26.6%55.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate16.0%3.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)538262022 calendar year
Permits per 1,000 residents6.5 — more favorable1.22022 calendar year
Permit change (year over year)−41.8%−79.4%2022 calendar year
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.3"37.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi — more favorable22 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.2 min — more favorable33.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.536.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools23132024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.9 — more favorable18.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency38.1%80.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency41.5%76.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility92.4%12.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gastonia

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm.

Waxhaw

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gastonia
—
Gastonia: Your Score
58
Area Score
Waxhaw
—
Waxhaw: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gastonia, NC · Waxhaw, NC · How this is calculated: methodology