Garner vs Midland

Which is the better fit for you?

Garner, NC
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally
Midland, TX
63
Area Score
Top 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Garner receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Garner to Midland

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% lower
Regional price level 95.4 against 98.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$240 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,780 in Midland against $1,540 in Garner.
The median home
10% less
$319,200 in Midland against $355,000 in Garner.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 33°F in Midland against 32°F in Garner; July highs are 96°F against 91°F (summers 5°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

26 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Garner
Midland
Opportunity: Midland is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
73 · Top 19%
vs
84 · Top 3%
Growth: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 43%
vs
63 · Bottom 27%
Physical resilience: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
58 · Top 50%
Housing affordability: Midland is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
65 · Bottom 46%
vs
69 · Top 43%
Schools: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
24 · Bottom 17%
vs
8 · Bottom 2%
Access: Midland is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 48%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
51 · Bottom 37%

Measured values

MetricGarnerMidlandSource period
Population34,473136,6402024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$78,756$89,585 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,201$49,879 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,747/sq mi1,794/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$355,000$319,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,549$1,434 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,540 — more favorable$1,780FY2026
Cost of living index98.495.4 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate63.2%65.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6%3.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%+2.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.5% — more favorable33.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate7.4% — more favorable12.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,15891312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents33.6 — more favorable6.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−20.4% — more favorable−41.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.1"13.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute28.5 min21.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.731.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools14482024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.5 — more favorable18.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.5%35.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency38.9%33.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility81.8%56.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

North Carolina and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Garner

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Midland

Elevated or high exposure: hail, drought, wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Garner
—
Garner: Your Score
66
Area Score
Midland
—
Midland: Your Score
63
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Garner, NC · Midland, TX · How this is calculated: methodology