Garfield Heights vs Maple Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

Garfield Heights, OH
57
Area Score
Bottom 42% nationally
Maple Heights, OH
58
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Maple Heights receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Garfield Heights to Maple Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 92.9 against 92.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,180 in Maple Heights against $1,180 in Garfield Heights.
The median home
11% less
$97,900 in Maple Heights against $109,900 in Garfield Heights.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 24°F in Maple Heights against 24°F in Garfield Heights; July highs are 81°F against 81°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Garfield Heights
Maple Heights
Opportunity
45 · Bottom 27%
vs
45 · Bottom 26%
Growth: Maple Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
38 · Bottom 26%
vs
43 · Bottom 33%
Climate
69 · Bottom 45%
vs
69 · Bottom 45%
Physical resilience
97 · Top 2%
vs
97 · Top 2%
Housing affordability: Maple Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
59 · Bottom 33%
vs
76 · Top 21%
Schools: Garfield Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
18 · Bottom 9%
vs
9 · Bottom 3%
Access: Garfield Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 23%
vs
96 · Top 34%
Economic stability: Maple Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
35 · Bottom 15%

Measured values

MetricGarfield HeightsMaple HeightsSource period
Population29,26923,2582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$54,593 ±$5,060$53,414 ±$8,3972024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$27,666 ±$1,785$26,092 ±$2,2562024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,048/sq mi4,500/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$109,900$97,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,129 — more favorable$1,3382024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,180$1,180FY2025
Cost of living index92.992.92023
Homeownership rate58.5%62.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1% — more favorable4.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.2%−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate14.6% ±2%16.0% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate21.4% ±5%25.3% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+48.9%+33.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high81°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low24°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.3"33.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.1 min ±1.2 min23.6 min ±1.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.137.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1062024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.9 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.0% — more favorable30.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.0% — more favorable35.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Garfield Heights
—
Garfield Heights: Your Score
57
Area Score
Maple Heights
—
Maple Heights: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Garfield Heights, OH · Maple Heights, OH · How this is calculated: methodology