Gardner vs Kansas City

Which is the better fit for you?

Gardner, KS
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally
Kansas City, KS
55
Area Score
Bottom 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Gardner receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gardner to Kansas City

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 93.2 against 93.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$80 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,400 in Kansas City against $1,480 in Gardner.
The median home
45% less
$167,400 in Kansas City against $306,200 in Gardner.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Kansas City against 20°F in Gardner; July highs are 90°F against 89°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Gardner
Kansas City
Opportunity: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 33%
vs
36 · Bottom 12%
Growth: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
83 · Top 3%
vs
63 · Top 23%
Climate: Kansas City is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
65 · Bottom 36%
vs
66 · Bottom 36%
Physical resilience: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
83 · Top 19%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Housing affordability: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 13%
vs
75 · Top 24%
Schools: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 28%
vs
16 · Bottom 8%
Access: Kansas City is the more favorable of the two.
Access
81 · Bottom 22%
vs
95 · Top 37%
Economic stability: Gardner is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
79 · Top 5%
vs
39 · Bottom 20%

Measured values

MetricGardnerKansas CitySource period
Population24,526155,1352024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$96,818 — more favorable$62,4012024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$37,845 — more favorable$29,3172024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,683/sq mi1,244/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$306,200$167,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,306$1,123 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,480$1,400 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index93.293.22023
Homeownership rate67.6%60.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.4% — more favorable5.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.5%−2.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher32.0% — more favorable20.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.8% — more favorable15.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)29351712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents11.9 — more favorable3.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+95.3%+29.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.5"38.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport36 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.0 min ±1.4 min24.0 min ±0.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age30.733.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools10572024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.0 — more favorable15.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency37.7% — more favorable20.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency39.8% — more favorable22.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility39.9%76.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gardner

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Kansas City

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gardner
—
Gardner: Your Score
74
Area Score
Kansas City
—
Kansas City: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gardner, KS · Kansas City, KS · How this is calculated: methodology