Fruita vs Owatonna

Which is the better fit for you?

Fruita, CO
59
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally
Owatonna, MN
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fruita receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fruita to Owatonna

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Owatonna, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$107 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,142 in Owatonna against $1,249 in Fruita.
The median home
38% less
$245,200 in Owatonna against $398,200 in Fruita.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F colder
Normal January lows are 5°F in Owatonna against 17°F in Fruita; July highs are 82°F against 95°F (summers 13°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fruita
Owatonna
Opportunity: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
34 · Bottom 10%
Growth: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
39 · Bottom 27%
Climate: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
52 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
78 · Top 26%
vs
77 · Top 28%
Housing affordability: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
63 · Bottom 42%
vs
62 · Bottom 40%
Schools: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
43 · Bottom 42%
vs
40 · Bottom 36%
Access: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 34%
vs
79 · Bottom 20%
Economic stability: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 15%
vs
65 · Top 36%

Measured values

MetricFruitaOwatonnaSource period
Population13,69126,4982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$87,184 ±$3,356$80,750 ±$8,3662024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,059 ±$3,119$41,767 ±$2,4782024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,709/sq mi1,747/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$398,200$245,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,472$1,067 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,249$1,142 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate79.9%75.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3% — more favorable5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.8% — more favorable−3.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate33.6% ±4%29.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.5% — more favorable8.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)862512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.3 — more favorable0.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−49.7%+66.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F5°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation9.1"35.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable39 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.5 min ±2.4 min19.7 min ±1.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.540.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6122024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.514.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.2%50.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.4%55.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility34.1%42.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Colorado and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fruita

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Owatonna

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fruita
—
Fruita: Your Score
59
Area Score
Owatonna
—
Owatonna: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fruita, CO · Owatonna, MN · How this is calculated: methodology