Franklin Park vs Schiller Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Franklin Park, IL
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally
Schiller Park, IL
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Schiller Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Franklin Park to Schiller Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$129 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,580 in Schiller Park against $1,451 in Franklin Park.
The median home
4% less
$275,000 in Schiller Park against $287,000 in Franklin Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Schiller Park against 19°F in Franklin Park; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Franklin Park
Schiller Park
Opportunity: Schiller Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
31 · Bottom 7%
vs
32 · Bottom 8%
Growth: Franklin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
16 · Bottom 3%
vs
10 · Bottom 1%
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
62 · Bottom 23%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
69 · Top 38%
Housing affordability: Schiller Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
77 · Top 21%
Schools: Schiller Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
58 · Top 39%
vs
64 · Top 32%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Schiller Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 40%
vs
81 · Top 3%

Measured values

MetricFranklin ParkSchiller ParkSource period
Population18,19711,3932024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$76,519 ±$5,999$69,696 ±$23,7382024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,284 ±$2,212$33,812 ±$3,8352024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,809/sq mi4,113/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$287,000$275,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,109 — more favorable$1,2212024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,451 — more favorable$1,580FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate75.1%59.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate19.7% ±3%26.2% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.7%2.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.4%−42.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.9"37.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate31.4 min ±1.9 min28.4 min ±3.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.339.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools732024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.511.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency36.7%38.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.4%40.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility57.8%68.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Franklin Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Schiller Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Franklin Park
—
Franklin Park: Your Score
53
Area Score
Schiller Park
—
Schiller Park: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Franklin Park, IL · Schiller Park, IL · How this is calculated: methodology