Franklin Park vs Flat Rock

Which is the better fit for you?

Franklin Park, IL
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally
Flat Rock, MI
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Flat Rock receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Franklin Park to Flat Rock

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 98.2 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$71 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,380 in Flat Rock against $1,451 in Franklin Park.
The median home
20% less
$228,800 in Flat Rock against $287,000 in Franklin Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Flat Rock against 19°F in Franklin Park; July highs are 84°F against 85°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Franklin Park
Flat Rock
Opportunity: Flat Rock is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
31 · Bottom 7%
vs
36 · Bottom 12%
Growth: Franklin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
16 · Bottom 3%
vs
8 · Bottom 1%
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
62 · Bottom 24%
Physical resilience: Flat Rock is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
79 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Flat Rock is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
87 · Top 4%
Schools: Flat Rock is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
58 · Top 39%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: Flat Rock is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Franklin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 40%
vs
56 · Bottom 46%

Measured values

MetricFranklin ParkFlat RockSource period
Population18,19710,3402024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$76,519 ±$5,999$81,585 ±$9,8272024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$31,284$41,239 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,809/sq mi1,574/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$287,000$228,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,109$919 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,451$1,380 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.598.2 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate75.1%83.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4% — more favorable7.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher19.7%29.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.7% ±5%10.4% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.4%−83.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.9"34.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable9 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate31.4 min ±1.9 min30.6 min ±3.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.339.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools792024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.5 — more favorable17.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency36.7%42.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.4%60.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility57.8%40.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Illinois and Michigan do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Franklin Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Flat Rock

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Franklin Park
—
Franklin Park: Your Score
53
Area Score
Flat Rock
—
Flat Rock: Your Score
57
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Franklin Park, IL · Flat Rock, MI · How this is calculated: methodology