Fortuna Foothills vs Kingman

Which is the better fit for you?

Fortuna Foothills, AZ
44
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally
Kingman, AZ
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fortuna Foothills receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fortuna Foothills to Kingman

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% higher
Regional price level 90.5 against 88.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$17 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,365 in Kingman against $1,382 in Fortuna Foothills.
The median home
34% more
$267,700 in Kingman against $199,200 in Fortuna Foothills.
The weather you would swap
Winters 14°F colder
Normal January lows are 31°F in Kingman against 45°F in Fortuna Foothills; July highs are 99°F against 107°F (summers 8°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Fortuna Foothills
Kingman
Opportunity: Fortuna Foothills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
26 · Bottom 4%
vs
20 · Bottom 1%
Growth: Fortuna Foothills is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
71 · Top 14%
vs
58 · Top 33%
Climate: Fortuna Foothills is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
58 · Bottom 10%
Physical resilience: Kingman is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
20 · Bottom 13%
vs
21 · Bottom 16%
Housing affordability
67 · Top 48%
vs
67 · Top 48%
Schools: Kingman is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
19 · Bottom 12%
vs
25 · Bottom 19%
Access: Fortuna Foothills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
89 · Bottom 38%
vs
83 · Bottom 26%
Economic stability: Kingman is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
41 · Bottom 23%
vs
45 · Bottom 27%

Measured values

MetricFortuna FoothillsKingmanSource period
Population28,89634,3752024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$60,474 ±$3,961$61,792 ±$4,9642024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$34,795 ±$2,354$34,866 ±$2,6582024 ACS 5-Year
Population density721/sq mi916/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$199,200$267,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,141 ±$155$1,058 ±$722024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,382$1,365 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index88.1 — more favorable90.52023
Homeownership rate83.6%68.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate18.9%6.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.0% — more favorable−5.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.5%20.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.7% ±3%13.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,21516912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.7 — more favorable4.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+3.1%−1.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high107°F99°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F31°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation3.6"8.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi — more favorable31 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.7 min19.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age61.143.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1172024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.421.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency36.0%36.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency35.6%37.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fortuna Foothills

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Kingman

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fortuna Foothills
—
Fortuna Foothills: Your Score
44
Area Score
Kingman
—
Kingman: Your Score
41
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fortuna Foothills, AZ · Kingman, AZ · How this is calculated: methodology