Fort Payne vs Vidalia

Which is the better fit for you?

Fort Payne, AL
53
Area Score
Bottom 29% nationally
Vidalia, GA
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fort Payne and Vidalia receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fort Payne to Vidalia

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Fort Payne or Vidalia, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$197 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Vidalia against $776 in Fort Payne.
The median home
1% more
$158,500 in Vidalia against $157,000 in Fort Payne.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F milder
Normal January lows are 39°F in Vidalia against 30°F in Fort Payne; July highs are 92°F against 87°F (summers 5°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fort Payne
Vidalia
Opportunity
46 · Bottom 28%
vs
46 · Bottom 28%
Growth: Fort Payne is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
46 · Bottom 40%
vs
45 · Bottom 38%
Climate: Fort Payne is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 22%
vs
72 · Top 39%
Physical resilience: Vidalia is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
46 · Bottom 37%
vs
53 · Bottom 46%
Housing affordability: Vidalia is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 17%
vs
79 · Top 15%
Schools: Fort Payne is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
36 · Bottom 32%
vs
35 · Bottom 30%
Access: Fort Payne is the more favorable of the two.
Access
63 · Bottom 7%
vs
58 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Vidalia is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
21 · Bottom 3%
vs
25 · Bottom 5%

Measured values

MetricFort PayneVidaliaSource period
Population14,92710,7522024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$47,479 ±$7,304$49,370 ±$6,0912024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$26,126 ±$2,831$25,239 ±$2,3972024 ACS 5-Year
Population density265/sq mi601/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$157,000$158,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$679 — more favorable$7942024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$776 — more favorable$973FY2026
Homeownership rate69.3%48.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.1%+2.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher17.3%23.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate31.2% ±6%26.0% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)243112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.62.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)0.0%−11.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F92°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F39°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.2"47.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport63 mi — more favorable70 miNASR current cycle
Average commute19.3 min — more favorable23.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.440.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools742024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.513.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.6%33.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.6%33.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility63.9%93.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Alabama and Georgia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fort Payne

Elevated or high exposure: cold wave, earthquake.

Vidalia

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, drought.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fort Payne
—
Fort Payne: Your Score
53
Area Score
Vidalia
—
Vidalia: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fort Payne, AL · Vidalia, GA · How this is calculated: methodology