Fort Mohave vs Torrington

Which is the better fit for you?

Fort Mohave, AZ
39
Area Score
Bottom 2% nationally
Torrington, CT
42
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Torrington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fort Mohave to Torrington

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Torrington, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
The median home
27% less
$215,500 in Torrington against $294,300 in Fort Mohave.
The weather you would swap
Winters 27°F colder
Normal January lows are 19°F in Torrington against 46°F in Fort Mohave; July highs are 85°F against 111°F (summers 26°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fort Mohave
Torrington
Opportunity: Torrington is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
16 · Bottom 1%
vs
24 · Bottom 3%
Growth: Fort Mohave is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
33 · Bottom 18%
vs
14 · Bottom 3%
Climate: Torrington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
51 · Bottom 1%
vs
62 · Bottom 23%
Physical resilience: Torrington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 16%
vs
33 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Torrington is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 43%
vs
75 · Top 26%
Schools: Fort Mohave is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
41 · Bottom 39%
Access: Fort Mohave is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 33%
vs
91 · Bottom 45%
Economic stability: Torrington is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
51 · Bottom 38%

Measured values

MetricFort MohaveTorringtonSource period
Population15,71535,5472024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$64,815 ±$6,773$70,856 ±$4,9372024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$33,933$39,031 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density941/sq mi894/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$294,300$215,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,010 — more favorable$1,1692024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate85.8%66.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.9%5.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−5.4%−5.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher10.8%24.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.1% ±3%13.7% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)900312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.1 — more favorable0.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−63.6%−76.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high111°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation4.3"47.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable24 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.1 min — more favorable26.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age60.442.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools572024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.712.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.9%28.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.5%44.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Arizona and Connecticut do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fort Mohave

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Torrington

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fort Mohave
—
Fort Mohave: Your Score
39
Area Score
Torrington
—
Torrington: Your Score
42
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fort Mohave, AZ · Torrington, CT · How this is calculated: methodology