Forest Park vs Naperville

Which is the better fit for you?

Forest Park, IL
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally
Naperville, IL
70
Area Score
Top 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Naperville receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Forest Park to Naperville

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$855 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,535 in Naperville against $1,680 in Forest Park.
The median home
77% more
$540,200 in Naperville against $304,700 in Forest Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F colder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Naperville against 19°F in Forest Park; July highs are 84°F against 85°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Forest Park
Naperville
Opportunity: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
38 · Bottom 14%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth
49 · Bottom 48%
vs
49 · Bottom 47%
Climate: Forest Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
60 · Bottom 15%
Physical resilience: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
82 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 22%
vs
84 · Top 6%
Schools: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
86 · Top 5%
vs
91 · Top 2%
Access: Forest Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
92 · Bottom 47%
Economic stability: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 47%
vs
75 · Top 13%

Measured values

MetricForest ParkNapervilleSource period
Population13,943150,6922024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$77,221$155,105 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$54,640$73,721 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,805/sq mi3,829/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$304,700$540,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,367 — more favorable$1,8852024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,680 — more favorable$2,535FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate52.8%74.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1% — more favorable−3.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher51.5%72.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.8%4.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1831012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.32.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+157.1%+11.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"33.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable20 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.7 min — more favorable32.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.040.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools5442024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.7 — more favorable14.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.6%64.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.3%66.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility51.1%15.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Forest Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Naperville

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Forest Park
—
Forest Park: Your Score
63
Area Score
Naperville
—
Naperville: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Forest Park, IL · Naperville, IL · How this is calculated: methodology