Fontana vs Rancho Cucamonga

Which is the better fit for you?

Fontana, CA
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rancho Cucamonga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fontana to Rancho Cucamonga

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 107.3 against 107.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,201 in Rancho Cucamonga against $2,201 in Fontana.
The median home
26% more
$740,200 in Rancho Cucamonga against $586,800 in Fontana.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 45°F in Rancho Cucamonga against 45°F in Fontana; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fontana
Rancho Cucamonga
Opportunity: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
46 · Bottom 29%
vs
56 · Top 49%
Growth: Fontana is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
59 · Top 31%
vs
32 · Bottom 17%
Climate
89 · Top 5%
vs
89 · Top 5%
Physical resilience
7 · Bottom 2%
vs
7 · Bottom 2%
Housing affordability: Fontana is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
47 · Bottom 18%
vs
40 · Bottom 10%
Schools: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
20 · Bottom 13%
vs
65 · Top 30%
Access
100 · Top 1%
vs
100 · Top 1%
Economic stability: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 50%
vs
61 · Top 43%

Measured values

MetricFontanaRancho CucamongaSource period
Population214,169175,4112024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$102,821$111,895 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$33,149$47,475 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,948/sq mi3,771/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$586,800$740,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,839 — more favorable$2,3572024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,201$2,201FY2026
Cost of living index107.3107.32023
Homeownership rate66.8%62.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1%4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher21.4%37.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.9%7.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,22529212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.7 — more favorable1.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−15.2%−64.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.6"11.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi6 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate34.9 min ±0.9 min34.5 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.838.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools56362024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.4 — more favorable24.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency28.6%54.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.8%70.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility77.9%47.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fontana

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Rancho Cucamonga

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fontana
—
Fontana: Your Score
47
Area Score
Rancho Cucamonga
—
Rancho Cucamonga: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fontana, CA · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · How this is calculated: methodology