Flowing Wells vs Tucson

Which is the better fit for you?

Flowing Wells, AZ
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally
Tucson, AZ
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Flowing Wells receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Flowing Wells to Tucson

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.9 against 94.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$16 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,244 in Tucson against $1,229 in Flowing Wells.
The median home
548% more
$266,200 in Tucson against $41,100 in Flowing Wells.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 41°F in Tucson against 41°F in Flowing Wells; July highs are 100°F against 99°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Flowing Wells
Tucson
Opportunity: Tucson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
11 · Bottom 1%
vs
22 · Bottom 2%
Growth: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 49%
vs
44 · Bottom 36%
Climate: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
64 · Bottom 33%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience
19 · Bottom 13%
vs
19 · Bottom 13%
Housing affordability: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 39%
vs
63 · Bottom 41%
Schools: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 49%
vs
42 · Bottom 40%
Access: Tucson is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 33%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Tucson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
31 · Bottom 11%
vs
40 · Bottom 21%

Measured values

MetricFlowing WellsTucsonSource period
Population16,559547,0732024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$39,774$57,073 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$23,553$32,537 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,347/sq mi2,259/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$41,100$266,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,034 ±$172$1,145 ±$132024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,229 — more favorable$1,244FY2026
Cost of living index94.994.92023
Homeownership rate69.3%51.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.6%5.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.5%−4.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher13.4%31.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate23.8% ±7%17.0% ±0.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4,7901,43112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.5 — more favorable2.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+5.2% — more favorable−2.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high99°F100°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.1"10.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi5 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.3 min ±1.9 min23.6 min ±0.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.934.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.115.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency45.1% — more favorable39.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.3% — more favorable39.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Flowing Wells

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Tucson

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Flowing Wells
—
Flowing Wells: Your Score
43
Area Score
Tucson
—
Tucson: Your Score
42
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Flowing Wells, AZ · Tucson, AZ · How this is calculated: methodology