Florham Park vs Newark

Which is the better fit for you?

Florham Park, NJ
70
Area Score
Top 14% nationally
Newark, NJ
53
Area Score
Bottom 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Florham Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Florham Park to Newark

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,205 in Newark against $2,205 in Florham Park.
The median home
53% less
$373,700 in Newark against $791,400 in Florham Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 26°F in Newark against 23°F in Florham Park; July highs are 87°F against 85°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Florham Park
Newark
Opportunity: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
80 · Top 8%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
53 · Top 42%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
65 · Bottom 35%
vs
71 · Top 48%
Physical resilience: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
60 · Bottom 36%
vs
53 · Bottom 24%
Schools: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
93 · Top 1%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 25%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
33 · Bottom 13%

Measured values

MetricFlorham ParkNewarkSource period
Population13,564310,1782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$158,696 — more favorable$52,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$78,037 — more favorable$27,1932024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,855/sq mi12,847/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$791,400$373,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$3,109$1,392 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,205$2,205FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate69.8%24.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable6.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.8%+1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher69.9% — more favorable19.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.3% — more favorable23.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)472,47212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.58.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−25.4%−4.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.9"46.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute28.2 min — more favorable35.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.934.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4832024-25 school year
Students per teacher10.6 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency70.4% — more favorable32.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency77.1% — more favorable43.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility11.6%81.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Florham Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Newark

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Florham Park
—
Florham Park: Your Score
70
Area Score
Newark
—
Newark: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Florham Park, NJ · Newark, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology