Floral Park vs Seaford

Which is the better fit for you?

Floral Park, NY
73
Area Score
Top 6% nationally
Seaford, NY
74
Area Score
Top 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Seaford receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Floral Park to Seaford

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,747 in Seaford against $2,747 in Floral Park.
The median home
17% less
$658,300 in Seaford against $789,600 in Floral Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 25°F in Seaford against 26°F in Floral Park; July highs are 83°F against 84°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Floral Park
Seaford
Opportunity
79 · Top 9%
vs
79 · Top 10%
Growth: Floral Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
55 · Top 39%
vs
47 · Bottom 43%
Climate: Floral Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
71 · Top 45%
vs
70 · Top 50%
Physical resilience: Seaford is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 12%
vs
93 · Top 9%
Housing affordability: Seaford is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
49 · Bottom 19%
vs
55 · Bottom 28%
Schools: Seaford is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
76 · Top 17%
vs
78 · Top 15%
Access: Floral Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
95 · Top 39%
Economic stability
82 · Top 2%
vs
82 · Top 2%

Measured values

MetricFloral ParkSeafordSource period
Population16,16915,5492024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$150,084 ±$16,801$172,557 ±$19,1772024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$69,449 ±$6,426$66,578 ±$5,7342024 ACS 5-Year
Population density11,379/sq mi5,957/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$789,600$658,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,243 ±$301$2,489 ±$8602024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,747$2,747FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate85.5%92.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.1%+1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher59.8% — more favorable46.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate3.2% ±1%3.6% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3396212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+200.0%+21.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low26°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.3"38.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute36.5 min — more favorable40.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.540.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools652024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.110.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency74.8%75.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.7%72.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility39.0%13.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Floral Park

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake.

Seaford

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Floral Park
—
Floral Park: Your Score
73
Area Score
Seaford
—
Seaford: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Floral Park, NY · Seaford, NY · How this is calculated: methodology