Fitchburg vs Stoughton

Which is the better fit for you?

Fitchburg, WI
77
Area Score
Top 3% nationally
Stoughton, WI
73
Area Score
Top 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fitchburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fitchburg to Stoughton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.9 against 95.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,694 in Stoughton against $1,694 in Fitchburg.
The median home
30% less
$293,500 in Stoughton against $417,200 in Fitchburg.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 12°F in Stoughton against 12°F in Fitchburg; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fitchburg
Stoughton
Opportunity: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
81 · Top 6%
vs
74 · Top 17%
Growth: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
65 · Top 22%
Climate
57 · Bottom 9%
vs
57 · Bottom 9%
Physical resilience: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
97 · Top 2%
vs
96 · Top 2%
Housing affordability: Stoughton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
82 · Top 9%
Schools: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
59 · Top 37%
vs
49 · Bottom 48%
Access: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 35%
vs
94 · Top 43%
Economic stability: Stoughton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 23%
vs
71 · Top 22%

Measured values

MetricFitchburgStoughtonSource period
Population32,61913,0332024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$86,516 ±$8,914$79,551 ±$11,1702024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$59,210 — more favorable$44,9152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density926/sq mi2,115/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$417,200$293,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,373$1,157 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,694$1,694FY2026
Cost of living index95.995.92023
Homeownership rate47.6%66.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.6% — more favorable2.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.1%−0.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher57.7% — more favorable39.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.8% ±3%6.8% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4326,27812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents13.2 — more favorable11.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−16.3%+18.9% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low12°F12°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.1"37.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi — more favorable16 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.5 min — more favorable24.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.439.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1962024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.0 — more favorable12.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.9% — more favorable38.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.8% — more favorable42.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility29.0%26.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fitchburg
—
Fitchburg: Your Score
77
Area Score
Stoughton
—
Stoughton: Your Score
73
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fitchburg, WI · Stoughton, WI · How this is calculated: methodology