Fishers vs Lawrence

Which is the better fit for you?

Fishers, IN
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally
Lawrence, IN
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fishers receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fishers to Lawrence

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.7 against 94.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$133 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,796 in Lawrence against $1,929 in Fishers.
The median home
41% less
$230,100 in Lawrence against $391,000 in Fishers.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 21°F in Lawrence against 21°F in Fishers; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fishers
Lawrence
Opportunity: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
81 · Top 7%
vs
71 · Top 22%
Growth: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
56 · Top 37%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Climate
68 · Bottom 40%
vs
68 · Bottom 40%
Physical resilience: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
76 · Top 30%
vs
66 · Top 41%
Housing affordability: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 11%
vs
69 · Top 44%
Schools: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
78 · Top 15%
vs
31 · Bottom 26%
Access: Lawrence is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 40%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability: Fishers is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
79 · Top 5%
vs
66 · Top 32%

Measured values

MetricFishersLawrenceSource period
Population102,33749,5172024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$130,203 — more favorable$74,0222024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$57,737 — more favorable$36,0792024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,828/sq mi2,457/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$391,000$230,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,611$1,178 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,929$1,796 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.794.72023
Homeownership rate76.2%66.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0% — more favorable3.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.9%−0.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher66.4% — more favorable35.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.9% — more favorable8.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5775812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.6 — more favorable1.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−27.5%−35.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F21°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.7"40.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport24 mi19 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute28.6 min26.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.634.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools20102024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.8 — more favorable19.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency67.7% — more favorable41.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.3% — more favorable39.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility21.7%53.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fishers

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, earthquake.

Lawrence

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fishers
—
Fishers: Your Score
75
Area Score
Lawrence
—
Lawrence: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fishers, IN · Lawrence, IN · How this is calculated: methodology