Fate vs Forney

Which is the better fit for you?

Fate, TX
73
Area Score
Top 6% nationally
Forney, TX
72
Area Score
Top 9% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fate receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fate to Forney

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$306 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,480 in Forney against $2,174 in Fate.
The median home
10% less
$346,400 in Forney against $384,300 in Fate.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 36°F in Forney against 36°F in Fate; July highs are 96°F against 96°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fate
Forney
Opportunity: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
77 · Top 13%
vs
73 · Top 20%
Growth: Forney is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
62 · Top 26%
vs
67 · Top 19%
Climate
68 · Bottom 42%
vs
68 · Bottom 42%
Physical resilience: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
80 · Top 25%
vs
77 · Top 28%
Housing affordability: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
71 · Top 36%
vs
65 · Bottom 46%
Schools: Forney is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
70 · Top 24%
vs
77 · Top 16%
Access: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 48%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
76 · Top 9%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricFateForneySource period
Population22,88431,5322024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$132,752 — more favorable$104,1122024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$41,804 ±$3,102$38,834 ±$3,3682024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,880/sq mi1,985/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$384,300$346,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,500$1,828 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,174 — more favorable$2,480FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate91.5%72.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.0% — more favorable4.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2%−0.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate42.3% ±4%36.6% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.7% — more favorable8.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)15829612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.99.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−60.9%−42.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high96°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation38.4"38.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport20 mi — more favorable24 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate38.3 min ±2.2 min37.9 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age31.631.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3232024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.615.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency64.4% — more favorable62.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency48.8%57.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility31.9%49.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fate

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Forney

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fate
—
Fate: Your Score
73
Area Score
Forney
—
Forney: Your Score
72
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fate, TX · Forney, TX · How this is calculated: methodology