Farmington vs Warren

Which is the better fit for you?

Farmington, MI
71
Area Score
Top 12% nationally
Warren, MI
52
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Farmington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Farmington to Warren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$174 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,439 in Warren against $1,612 in Farmington.
The median home
35% less
$193,400 in Warren against $297,200 in Farmington.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 20°F in Warren against 17°F in Farmington; July highs are 84°F against 82°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Farmington
Warren
Opportunity: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
53 · Bottom 43%
vs
29 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 48%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
97 · Top 1%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 29%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 43%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
69 · Top 27%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%

Measured values

MetricFarmingtonWarrenSource period
Population11,504137,9282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$97,750 — more favorable$64,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$54,364 — more favorable$33,0152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,320/sq mi4,012/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$297,200$193,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,340$1,225 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,612$1,439 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate61.7%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable7.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5% — more favorable−0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher62.4% — more favorable21.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.5% — more favorable14.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1410112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.2 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+366.7%+274.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.2"29.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.7 min ±2.0 min26.3 min ±0.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.038.32024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.8 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.9% — more favorable25.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.8% — more favorable36.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Farmington
—
Farmington: Your Score
71
Area Score
Warren
—
Warren: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Farmington, MI · Warren, MI · How this is calculated: methodology