Farmington vs Sterling Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

Farmington, MI
71
Area Score
Top 12% nationally
Sterling Heights, MI
61
Area Score
Top 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Farmington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Farmington to Sterling Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$217 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,395 in Sterling Heights against $1,612 in Farmington.
The median home
8% less
$274,300 in Sterling Heights against $297,200 in Farmington.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 18°F in Sterling Heights against 17°F in Farmington; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Farmington
Sterling Heights
Opportunity: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
53 · Bottom 43%
vs
38 · Bottom 14%
Growth: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 48%
vs
63 · Top 24%
Climate: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
62 · Bottom 19%
Physical resilience: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
97 · Top 1%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 29%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 43%
vs
85 · Bottom 28%
Economic stability: Farmington is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
69 · Top 27%
vs
54 · Bottom 44%

Measured values

MetricFarmingtonSterling HeightsSource period
Population11,504133,5732024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$97,750 — more favorable$79,9092024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$54,364 — more favorable$38,0842024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,320/sq mi3,665/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$297,200$274,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,340 ±$54$1,292 ±$512024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,612$1,395 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate61.7%75.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable6.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5% — more favorable−0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher62.4% — more favorable31.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.5% — more favorable11.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1472812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.25.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+366.7%+89.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.2"35.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi — more favorable30 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.7 min ±2.0 min26.9 min ±0.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.041.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.816.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.9% — more favorable43.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.8% — more favorable53.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Farmington
—
Farmington: Your Score
71
Area Score
Sterling Heights
—
Sterling Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Farmington, MI · Sterling Heights, MI · How this is calculated: methodology