Farmington Hills vs Warren

Which is the better fit for you?

Farmington Hills, MI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally
Warren, MI
52
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Farmington Hills receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Farmington Hills to Warren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$193 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,439 in Warren against $1,632 in Farmington Hills.
The median home
45% less
$193,400 in Warren against $354,500 in Farmington Hills.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 20°F in Warren against 17°F in Farmington Hills; July highs are 84°F against 82°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Farmington Hills
Warren
Opportunity: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
51 · Bottom 40%
vs
29 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
24 · Bottom 8%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 6%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 27%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 47%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Farmington Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
65 · Top 36%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%

Measured values

MetricFarmington HillsWarrenSource period
Population83,515137,9282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$104,836 — more favorable$64,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$56,976 — more favorable$33,0152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,510/sq mi4,012/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$354,500$193,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,551$1,225 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,632$1,439 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate64.7%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0% — more favorable7.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5% — more favorable−0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher57.6% — more favorable21.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate7.3% — more favorable14.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1910112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.20.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−13.6%+274.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.2"29.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.8 min ±0.8 min26.3 min ±0.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.638.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools21402024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.0 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.4% — more favorable25.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.5% — more favorable36.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility26.0%74.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Farmington Hills
—
Farmington Hills: Your Score
65
Area Score
Warren
—
Warren: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Farmington Hills, MI · Warren, MI · How this is calculated: methodology