Fairland vs Tuckahoe

Which is the better fit for you?

Fairland, MD
68
Area Score
Top 19% nationally
Tuckahoe, VA
70
Area Score
Top 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tuckahoe receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fairland to Tuckahoe

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
10% lower
Regional price level 98.3 against 109.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$505 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,655 in Tuckahoe against $2,160 in Fairland.
The median home
3% less
$462,800 in Tuckahoe against $477,300 in Fairland.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 28°F in Tuckahoe against 25°F in Fairland; July highs are 89°F against 89°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Fairland
Tuckahoe
Opportunity: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 45%
vs
61 · Top 40%
Growth: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 48%
vs
52 · Top 46%
Climate: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 36%
vs
75 · Top 28%
Physical resilience
85 · Top 17%
vs
85 · Top 17%
Housing affordability: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
65 · Bottom 46%
vs
70 · Top 40%
Schools: Fairland is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
75 · Top 18%
vs
74 · Top 19%
Access: Fairland is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 44%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability
66 · Top 32%
vs
66 · Top 34%

Measured values

MetricFairlandTuckahoeSource period
Population26,23149,1832024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$98,800 ±$10,410$102,264 ±$7,1482024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$46,997$64,015 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,283/sq mi2,406/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$477,300$462,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,894$1,536 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,160$1,655 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index109.598.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate46.0%63.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.7%−1.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.4%56.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.1% ±4%7.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,6011,72612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.45.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+129.6% — more favorable−0.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F28°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.0"45.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi16 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute37.2 min22.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.540.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.3 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.7%88.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.4%87.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Maryland and Virginia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fairland

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Tuckahoe

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fairland
—
Fairland: Your Score
68
Area Score
Tuckahoe
—
Tuckahoe: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fairland, MD · Tuckahoe, VA · How this is calculated: methodology