Erlanger vs Cincinnati

Which is the better fit for you?

Erlanger, KY
67
Area Score
Top 23% nationally
Cincinnati, OH
64
Area Score
Top 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Erlanger receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Erlanger to Cincinnati

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.2 against 94.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$372 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,188 in Cincinnati against $1,560 in Erlanger.
The median home
10% more
$230,900 in Cincinnati against $209,000 in Erlanger.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 24°F in Cincinnati against 23°F in Erlanger; July highs are 87°F against 86°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Erlanger
Cincinnati
Opportunity: Erlanger is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 23%
vs
63 · Top 37%
Growth: Erlanger is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
66 · Top 20%
vs
65 · Top 22%
Climate
69 · Bottom 45%
vs
69 · Bottom 46%
Physical resilience: Cincinnati is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
80 · Top 25%
vs
89 · Top 12%
Housing affordability: Erlanger is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 10%
vs
72 · Top 33%
Schools
18 · Bottom 10%
vs
18 · Bottom 10%
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
98 · Top 17%
Economic stability: Erlanger is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
36 · Bottom 16%

Measured values

MetricErlangerCincinnatiSource period
Population19,875311,2242024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$75,840 — more favorable$52,9092024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$41,170 ±$4,013$40,324 ±$9592024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,369/sq mi3,994/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$209,000$230,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$970 ±$40$1,001 ±$202024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,560$1,188 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.294.22023
Homeownership rate69.3%39.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.7% — more favorable+0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher32.1%41.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate13.2% — more favorable23.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4098412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.03.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+17.6%+268.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.3"43.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi — more favorable11 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.3 min ±1.5 min24.1 min ±0.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.033.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8852024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.3 — more favorable16.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency30.9%45.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.3%52.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility89.6%29.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kentucky and Ohio do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Erlanger

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Cincinnati

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Erlanger
—
Erlanger: Your Score
67
Area Score
Cincinnati
—
Cincinnati: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Erlanger, KY · Cincinnati, OH · How this is calculated: methodology