Elwood vs Massapequa Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Elwood, NY
73
Area Score
Top 8% nationally
Massapequa Park, NY
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Massapequa Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Elwood to Massapequa Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,747 in Massapequa Park against $2,747 in Elwood.
The median home
7% less
$642,600 in Massapequa Park against $689,500 in Elwood.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 25°F in Massapequa Park against 25°F in Elwood; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Elwood
Massapequa Park
Opportunity: Massapequa Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
77 · Top 13%
vs
79 · Top 9%
Growth: Elwood is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
34 · Bottom 19%
vs
33 · Bottom 18%
Climate
70 · Top 50%
vs
70 · Top 50%
Physical resilience: Elwood is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
95 · Top 4%
vs
93 · Top 9%
Housing affordability: Massapequa Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
88 · Top 3%
vs
92 · Top 1%
Schools: Massapequa Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
55 · Top 43%
vs
58 · Top 40%
Access: Massapequa Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
88 · Bottom 35%
vs
93 · Top 46%
Economic stability: Massapequa Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
78 · Top 7%
vs
81 · Top 3%

Measured values

MetricElwoodMassapequa ParkSource period
Population11,76216,9632024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$177,003 ±$13,112$171,953 ±$15,4712024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$71,798 ±$9,889$68,218 ±$3,8122024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,461/sq mi7,739/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$689,500$642,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,064 — more favorable$3,4692024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,747$2,747FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate94.8%98.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.0%+1.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate56.6% ±10%53.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate3.8% ±2%3.2% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,105212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.7 — more favorable0.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−11.8%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation38.3"38.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport27 mi17 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute43.9 min37.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.243.92024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher11.410.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency65.3%66.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency61.8% — more favorable60.0%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Elwood

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, hurricane.

Massapequa Park

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Elwood
—
Elwood: Your Score
73
Area Score
Massapequa Park
—
Massapequa Park: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Elwood, NY · Massapequa Park, NY · How this is calculated: methodology