Elkhorn vs Whitewater

Which is the better fit for you?

Elkhorn, WI
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Whitewater, WI
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Elkhorn and Whitewater receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Elkhorn to Whitewater

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Elkhorn or Whitewater, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,206 in Whitewater against $1,206 in Elkhorn.
The median home
16% less
$229,400 in Whitewater against $273,600 in Elkhorn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F colder
Normal January lows are 12°F in Whitewater against 16°F in Elkhorn; July highs are 82°F against 84°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Elkhorn
Whitewater
Opportunity: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
84 · Top 3%
vs
79 · Top 10%
Growth: Whitewater is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 8%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 16%
vs
57 · Bottom 9%
Physical resilience: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 12%
vs
82 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 5%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
45 · Bottom 44%
Access: Whitewater is the more favorable of the two.
Access
72 · Bottom 13%
vs
81 · Bottom 22%
Economic stability: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
72 · Top 20%
vs
55 · Bottom 44%

Measured values

MetricElkhornWhitewaterSource period
Population10,22115,8072024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$77,649 — more favorable$54,9692024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,858 — more favorable$25,8632024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,252/sq mi1,788/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$273,600$229,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,034 ±$114$1,041 ±$732024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,206$1,206FY2026
Homeownership rate54.8%31.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0%3.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.6%+2.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate30.1% ±5%35.2% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.7% ±3%13.4% ±8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)07512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.04.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−26.0%+92.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F12°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.9"36.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport52 mi37 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min18.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.622.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools762024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.512.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency43.5% — more favorable39.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.0% — more favorable39.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility32.4%48.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Elkhorn

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Whitewater

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Elkhorn
—
Elkhorn: Your Score
69
Area Score
Whitewater
—
Whitewater: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Elkhorn, WI · Whitewater, WI · How this is calculated: methodology