Elkhorn vs Fort Atkinson

Which is the better fit for you?

Elkhorn, WI
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Fort Atkinson, WI
65
Area Score
Top 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Elkhorn receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Elkhorn to Fort Atkinson

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Elkhorn or Fort Atkinson, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$50 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,156 in Fort Atkinson against $1,206 in Elkhorn.
The median home
23% less
$211,800 in Fort Atkinson against $273,600 in Elkhorn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F colder
Normal January lows are 11°F in Fort Atkinson against 16°F in Elkhorn; July highs are 83°F against 84°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Elkhorn
Fort Atkinson
Opportunity: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
84 · Top 3%
vs
72 · Top 20%
Growth: Fort Atkinson is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 8%
vs
32 · Bottom 17%
Climate: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 16%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 12%
vs
81 · Top 21%
Housing affordability: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 5%
vs
84 · Top 7%
Schools: Elkhorn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
48 · Bottom 48%
Access: Fort Atkinson is the more favorable of the two.
Access
72 · Bottom 13%
vs
86 · Bottom 30%
Economic stability
72 · Top 20%
vs
72 · Top 19%

Measured values

MetricElkhornFort AtkinsonSource period
Population10,22112,4632024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$77,649 ±$7,036$79,302 ±$8,0422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$42,858 ±$5,187$38,229 ±$3,0722024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,252/sq mi2,132/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$273,600$211,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,034 ±$114$961 ±$412024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,206$1,156 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate54.8%68.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0%2.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.6% — more favorable+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate30.1% ±5%26.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.7% ±3%6.8% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)01212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.01.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−26.0%−87.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.9"35.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport52 mi29 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.4 min ±2.4 min22.4 min ±2.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.643.52024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher15.512.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency43.5% — more favorable40.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.0% — more favorable40.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Elkhorn

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Fort Atkinson

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Elkhorn
—
Elkhorn: Your Score
69
Area Score
Fort Atkinson
—
Fort Atkinson: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Elkhorn, WI · Fort Atkinson, WI · How this is calculated: methodology