Effingham vs Oskaloosa

Which is the better fit for you?

Effingham, IL
66
Area Score
Top 25% nationally
Oskaloosa, IA
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Effingham receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Effingham to Oskaloosa

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Effingham or Oskaloosa, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$31 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $947 in Oskaloosa against $916 in Effingham.
The median home
14% less
$153,300 in Oskaloosa against $177,500 in Effingham.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F colder
Normal January lows are 14°F in Oskaloosa against 20°F in Effingham; July highs are 86°F against 89°F (summers 3°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Effingham
Oskaloosa
Opportunity
69 · Top 26%
vs
69 · Top 25%
Growth: Oskaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
65 · Top 21%
vs
70 · Top 16%
Climate: Effingham is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
66 · Bottom 37%
vs
59 · Bottom 11%
Physical resilience: Effingham is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
71 · Top 35%
vs
70 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Effingham is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 5%
vs
83 · Top 7%
Schools: Effingham is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
39 · Bottom 36%
Access: Oskaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Access
61 · Bottom 7%
vs
68 · Bottom 10%
Economic stability: Effingham is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 40%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricEffinghamOskaloosaSource period
Population12,34211,5042024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$72,377 ±$12,166$64,004 ±$6,1432024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,328 ±$3,080$35,751 ±$3,8542024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,144/sq mi1,428/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$177,500$153,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$725 — more favorable$8312024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$916 — more favorable$947FY2026
Homeownership rate66.1%60.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9%2.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.3% — more favorable−0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate29.1% ±4%25.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.9% ±5%16.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)556312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.55.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+111.5%+16.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F14°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.0"37.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport70 mi56 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute14.3 min — more favorable17.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.637.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools942024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.1 — more favorable13.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency25.7%61.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.6%65.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility43.1%41.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Illinois and Iowa do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Effingham

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Oskaloosa

Elevated or high exposure: heat wave, tornado, cold wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Effingham
—
Effingham: Your Score
66
Area Score
Oskaloosa
—
Oskaloosa: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Effingham, IL · Oskaloosa, IA · How this is calculated: methodology