Eastmont vs Picnic Point

Which is the better fit for you?

Eastmont, WA
57
Area Score
Bottom 44% nationally
Picnic Point, WA
56
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Eastmont receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Eastmont to Picnic Point

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$74 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,384 in Picnic Point against $2,310 in Eastmont.
The median home
6% more
$833,800 in Picnic Point against $784,000 in Eastmont.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Picnic Point against 37°F in Eastmont; July highs are 72°F against 72°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Eastmont
Picnic Point
Opportunity
57 · Top 47%
vs
57 · Top 48%
Growth
57 · Top 35%
vs
57 · Top 35%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
45 · Bottom 35%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Picnic Point is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
34 · Bottom 6%
vs
41 · Bottom 11%
Schools: Eastmont is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
65 · Top 30%
vs
48 · Bottom 47%
Access: Picnic Point is the more favorable of the two.
Access
84 · Bottom 27%
vs
86 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability: Eastmont is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
67 · Top 30%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricEastmontPicnic PointSource period
Population23,72110,2612024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$138,912 ±$9,200$129,734 ±$10,9882024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$54,049 ±$3,939$55,706 ±$3,8162024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,638/sq mi3,374/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$784,000$833,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,443 ±$306$2,319 ±$2272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,310 — more favorable$2,384FY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate88.8%79.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%5.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7%−0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate40.5% ±4%42.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.1% ±2%7.6% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3,5063,50612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.24.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−9.1%−9.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high72°F72°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"33.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport26 mi24 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate30.9 min ±1.7 min32.1 min ±3.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.541.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher17.9 — more favorable18.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency61.6% — more favorable52.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency69.2% — more favorable67.4%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Eastmont

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Picnic Point

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Eastmont
—
Eastmont: Your Score
57
Area Score
Picnic Point
—
Picnic Point: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Eastmont, WA · Picnic Point, WA · How this is calculated: methodology