East Rutherford vs Elmwood Park

Which is the better fit for you?

East Rutherford, NJ
62
Area Score
Top 40% nationally
Elmwood Park, NJ
60
Area Score
Top 46% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

East Rutherford receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from East Rutherford to Elmwood Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$280 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,690 in Elmwood Park against $2,410 in East Rutherford.
The median home
6% more
$483,700 in Elmwood Park against $458,100 in East Rutherford.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 26°F in Elmwood Park against 26°F in East Rutherford; July highs are 87°F against 87°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

East Rutherford
Elmwood Park
Opportunity: East Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
79 · Top 9%
vs
78 · Top 11%
Growth: East Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
46 · Bottom 41%
vs
37 · Bottom 25%
Climate
71 · Top 47%
vs
71 · Top 47%
Physical resilience
47 · Bottom 38%
vs
47 · Bottom 38%
Housing affordability: East Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 44%
vs
59 · Bottom 34%
Schools: Elmwood Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
42 · Bottom 40%
vs
43 · Bottom 42%
Access: East Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
95 · Top 38%
Economic stability: Elmwood Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
61 · Top 45%
vs
63 · Top 39%

Measured values

MetricEast RutherfordElmwood ParkSource period
Population10,31321,4122024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$97,993 ±$13,948$101,740 ±$10,5832024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$48,483 ±$5,141$43,773 ±$3,9722024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,778/sq mi8,101/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$458,100$483,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,952 ±$195$2,074 ±$1022024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,410 — more favorable$2,690FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate35.4%57.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.5%+2.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.7% — more favorable35.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate8.1% ±4%10.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)26412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.5 — more favorable0.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−69.8%+10.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low26°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.3"46.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate30.9 min ±2.8 min29.8 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.239.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools452024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.1 — more favorable13.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency30.3%35.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.7% — more favorable54.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility44.4%53.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

East Rutherford

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake.

Elmwood Park

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

East Rutherford
—
East Rutherford: Your Score
62
Area Score
Elmwood Park
—
Elmwood Park: Your Score
60
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: East Rutherford, NJ · Elmwood Park, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology