Dickinson vs Pasadena

Which is the better fit for you?

Dickinson, TX
63
Area Score
Top 34% nationally
Pasadena, TX
48
Area Score
Bottom 15% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Dickinson receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Dickinson to Pasadena

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 99.7 against 99.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$228 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,369 in Pasadena against $1,597 in Dickinson.
The median home
25% less
$209,600 in Pasadena against $278,000 in Dickinson.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 46°F in Pasadena against 46°F in Dickinson; July highs are 93°F against 93°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Dickinson
Pasadena
Opportunity: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
57 · Top 47%
vs
43 · Bottom 22%
Growth: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
49 · Bottom 47%
vs
28 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
79 · Top 19%
vs
75 · Top 27%
Physical resilience: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
59 · Top 48%
vs
21 · Bottom 15%
Housing affordability: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 25%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
59 · Top 38%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 37%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Dickinson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
37 · Bottom 17%

Measured values

MetricDickinsonPasadenaSource period
Population21,753149,4332024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$91,779 — more favorable$64,9272024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,439 — more favorable$29,0292024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,183/sq mi3,420/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$278,000$209,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,231 ±$118$1,213 ±$272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,597$1,369 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index99.799.72023
Homeownership rate71.8%54.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1% — more favorable5.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.2% — more favorable+0.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher25.5% — more favorable16.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.7% — more favorable18.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)435812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−14.0%−27.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F46°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation53.3"55.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate31.1 min ±2.0 min28.9 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.433.02024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher15.713.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.0% — more favorable50.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.8% — more favorable40.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Dickinson

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Pasadena

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Dickinson
—
Dickinson: Your Score
63
Area Score
Pasadena
—
Pasadena: Your Score
48
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Dickinson, TX · Pasadena, TX · How this is calculated: methodology