Dearborn vs Newburgh

Which is the better fit for you?

Dearborn, MI
51
Area Score
Bottom 24% nationally
Newburgh, NY
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Newburgh receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Dearborn to Newburgh

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
12% higher
Regional price level 109.7 against 98.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$457 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,979 in Newburgh against $1,522 in Dearborn.
The median home
13% more
$247,900 in Newburgh against $218,800 in Dearborn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 18°F in Newburgh against 19°F in Dearborn; July highs are 85°F against 84°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Dearborn
Newburgh
Opportunity: Newburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
35 · Bottom 11%
vs
39 · Bottom 16%
Growth: Newburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
15 · Bottom 3%
vs
37 · Bottom 25%
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
62 · Bottom 20%
Physical resilience: Dearborn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 22%
vs
75 · Top 31%
Housing affordability: Newburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
57 · Bottom 31%
vs
61 · Bottom 38%
Schools: Dearborn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
47 · Bottom 46%
vs
46 · Bottom 45%
Access: Newburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Economic stability: Dearborn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
29 · Bottom 9%
vs
28 · Bottom 8%

Measured values

MetricDearbornNewburghSource period
Population107,42328,5192024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$65,324 ±$3,496$56,960 ±$9,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$30,588 ±$1,442$31,232 ±$3,6892024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,430/sq mi7,493/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$218,800$247,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,327 — more favorable$1,4542024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,522 — more favorable$1,979FY2026
Cost of living index98.2 — more favorable109.72023
Homeownership rate68.4%34.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.7%5.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.0%+0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.6% — more favorable19.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate23.4% ±3%24.0% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)152612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.3%+13.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.3"41.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi4 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min — more favorable27.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.333.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher15.911.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency36.2%63.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency44.5%58.9%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Michigan and New York do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Dearborn

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Newburgh

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Dearborn
—
Dearborn: Your Score
51
Area Score
Newburgh
—
Newburgh: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Dearborn, MI · Newburgh, NY · How this is calculated: methodology