Dana Point vs Lake Forest

Which is the better fit for you?

Dana Point, CA
50
Area Score
Bottom 20% nationally
Lake Forest, CA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake Forest receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Dana Point to Lake Forest

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 114.7 against 114.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$44 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $3,236 in Lake Forest against $3,280 in Dana Point.
The median home
29% less
$937,000 in Lake Forest against $1,320,300 in Dana Point.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 49°F in Lake Forest against 49°F in Dana Point; July highs are 79°F against 79°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Dana Point
Lake Forest
Opportunity
60 · Top 41%
vs
60 · Top 41%
Growth: Dana Point is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
30 · Bottom 15%
vs
24 · Bottom 8%
Climate
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Physical resilience
11 · Bottom 7%
vs
11 · Bottom 7%
Housing affordability: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
29 · Bottom 3%
vs
37 · Bottom 8%
Schools: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
56 · Top 42%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Access
84 · Bottom 26%
vs
88 · Bottom 36%
Economic stability: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
65 · Top 36%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricDana PointLake ForestSource period
Population32,79086,2812024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$141,520 ±$12,055$135,175 ±$4,5032024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$84,639 — more favorable$60,6332024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,056/sq mi5,162/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,320,300$937,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$3,106$2,672 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,280$3,236 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index114.7114.72023
Homeownership rate62.4%70.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable4.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%−1.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher56.6% — more favorable50.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.5% ±2%8.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)213812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.6 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+16.7%−45.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high79°F79°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low49°F49°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.2"11.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport35 mi28 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.7 min27.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age47.440.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools492024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.2 — more favorable24.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency43.0%50.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency64.3% — more favorable61.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility43.6%48.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Dana Point

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Lake Forest

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Dana Point
—
Dana Point: Your Score
50
Area Score
Lake Forest
—
Lake Forest: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Dana Point, CA · Lake Forest, CA · How this is calculated: methodology