Cuyahoga Falls vs Ravenna

Which is the better fit for you?

Cuyahoga Falls, OH
66
Area Score
Top 25% nationally
Ravenna, OH
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Cuyahoga Falls receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cuyahoga Falls to Ravenna

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 92.9 against 92.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$148 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,200 in Ravenna against $1,348 in Cuyahoga Falls.
The median home
24% less
$139,700 in Ravenna against $183,300 in Cuyahoga Falls.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 21°F in Ravenna against 21°F in Cuyahoga Falls; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cuyahoga Falls
Ravenna
Opportunity: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 24%
vs
60 · Top 42%
Growth: Ravenna is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 8%
vs
29 · Bottom 14%
Climate
64 · Bottom 31%
vs
64 · Bottom 31%
Physical resilience: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
90 · Top 11%
vs
89 · Top 12%
Housing affordability: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
84 · Top 7%
vs
54 · Bottom 26%
Schools: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
26 · Bottom 19%
Access
93 · Top 46%
vs
93 · Top 48%
Economic stability: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
61 · Top 45%
vs
37 · Bottom 18%

Measured values

MetricCuyahoga FallsRavennaSource period
Population50,90911,2742024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$72,705 ±$5,336$59,971 ±$15,9052024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$43,797 — more favorable$32,4212024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,974/sq mi2,001/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$183,300$139,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,038$947 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,348$1,200 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index92.992.92023
Homeownership rate64.4%47.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)0.0% — more favorable−0.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher37.7% — more favorable20.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate10.2% — more favorable19.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)439212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.8 — more favorable0.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−52.1%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F21°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation32.5"32.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi — more favorable20 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.4 min ±0.8 min24.8 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.437.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9102024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.8 — more favorable15.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.7% — more favorable51.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency64.1% — more favorable57.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility61.8%60.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cuyahoga Falls

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Ravenna

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cuyahoga Falls
—
Cuyahoga Falls: Your Score
66
Area Score
Ravenna
—
Ravenna: Your Score
57
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cuyahoga Falls, OH · Ravenna, OH · How this is calculated: methodology