Culpeper vs Minnehaha

Which is the better fit for you?

Culpeper, VA
58
Area Score
Bottom 48% nationally
Minnehaha, WA
60
Area Score
Top 47% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Minnehaha receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Culpeper to Minnehaha

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% lower
Regional price level 106.7 against 109.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$499 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,922 in Minnehaha against $1,423 in Culpeper.
The median home
15% more
$447,900 in Minnehaha against $390,000 in Culpeper.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F milder
Normal January lows are 34°F in Minnehaha against 23°F in Culpeper; July highs are 81°F against 86°F (summers 5°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Culpeper
Minnehaha
Opportunity: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Top 50%
vs
57 · Top 47%
Growth: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 46%
vs
49 · Bottom 48%
Climate: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
69 · Bottom 44%
vs
73 · Top 36%
Physical resilience: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
65 · Top 43%
Housing affordability: Culpeper is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 15%
vs
68 · Top 45%
Schools: Culpeper is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
34 · Bottom 30%
vs
28 · Bottom 22%
Access: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Access
75 · Bottom 16%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Minnehaha is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 40%
vs
73 · Top 16%

Measured values

MetricCulpeperMinnehahaSource period
Population20,79411,4822024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$94,721 ±$11,972$100,668 ±$11,3212024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$37,739$47,326 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,757/sq mi5,195/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$390,000$447,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,416 — more favorable$1,7112024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,423 — more favorable$1,922FY2026
Cost of living index109.5106.7 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate59.2%76.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.4%−1.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate30.7% ±4%30.6% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.7%5.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2703,34712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.06.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−41.2%−13.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F34°F1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport44 mi5 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.0 min22.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.539.02024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher15.3 — more favorable18.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency80.8%46.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency74.6%60.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Virginia and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Culpeper

Elevated or high exposure: drought.

Minnehaha

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Culpeper
—
Culpeper: Your Score
58
Area Score
Minnehaha
—
Minnehaha: Your Score
60
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Culpeper, VA · Minnehaha, WA · How this is calculated: methodology