Cudahy vs Greenfield

Which is the better fit for you?

Cudahy, WI
59
Area Score
Top 49% nationally
Greenfield, WI
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Greenfield receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cudahy to Greenfield

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.7 against 95.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,338 in Greenfield against $1,338 in Cudahy.
The median home
21% more
$261,100 in Greenfield against $216,500 in Cudahy.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 17°F in Greenfield against 17°F in Cudahy; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cudahy
Greenfield
Opportunity: Greenfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Bottom 49%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth: Greenfield is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
16 · Bottom 3%
vs
27 · Bottom 12%
Climate
61 · Bottom 18%
vs
61 · Bottom 18%
Physical resilience
98 · Top 1%
vs
98 · Top 1%
Housing affordability
78 · Top 17%
vs
78 · Top 17%
Schools: Cudahy is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
33 · Bottom 28%
vs
18 · Bottom 10%
Access: Cudahy is the more favorable of the two.
Access
63 · Bottom 7%
vs
62 · Bottom 7%
Economic stability: Greenfield is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Bottom 49%
vs
69 · Top 25%

Measured values

MetricCudahyGreenfieldSource period
Population17,85337,3452024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$66,719 ±$5,921$70,459 ±$4,2652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$38,037$42,974 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,740/sq mi3,238/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$216,500$261,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,028 — more favorable$1,1702024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,338$1,338FY2026
Cost of living index95.795.72023
Homeownership rate61.4%54.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%3.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8%+0.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate29.1% ±4%33.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.9% ±4%8.6% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)075812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−100.0%−44.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F17°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.6"34.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport67 mi — more favorable68 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.0 min ±2.0 min23.7 min ±1.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.342.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6132024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable14.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.6% — more favorable24.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.8% — more favorable30.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility62.6%59.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cudahy
—
Cudahy: Your Score
59
Area Score
Greenfield
—
Greenfield: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cudahy, WI · Greenfield, WI · How this is calculated: methodology