Crofton vs Massapequa

Which is the better fit for you?

Crofton, MD
78
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Massapequa, NY
78
Area Score
Top 2% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Crofton and Massapequa receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Crofton to Massapequa

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% higher
Regional price level 112.6 against 103.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$890 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,747 in Massapequa against $1,857 in Crofton.
The median home
33% more
$693,200 in Massapequa against $519,900 in Crofton.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 25°F in Massapequa against 25°F in Crofton; July highs are 83°F against 89°F (summers 6°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

31 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Crofton
Massapequa
Opportunity: Massapequa is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
73 · Top 19%
vs
79 · Top 9%
Growth: Crofton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
53 · Top 43%
vs
47 · Bottom 43%
Climate: Crofton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 36%
vs
70 · Top 50%
Physical resilience: Crofton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
93 · Top 9%
Housing affordability: Massapequa is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 16%
vs
80 · Top 13%
Schools: Massapequa is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
82 · Top 9%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Access: Crofton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 18%
vs
94 · Top 43%
Economic stability: Crofton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
82 · Top 2%
vs
79 · Top 5%

Measured values

MetricCroftonMassapequaSource period
Population29,54921,3892024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$150,577$181,846 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$62,457$72,177 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,470/sq mi6,010/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$519,900$693,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,217 ±$160$2,631 ±$5792024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,857 — more favorable$2,747FY2026
Cost of living index103.2 — more favorable112.62023
Homeownership rate82.2%96.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6% — more favorable3.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4%+1.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher64.7% — more favorable53.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate2.3% ±1%2.4% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,39696212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.3 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+20.8%+21.8% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.0"38.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable16 miNASR current cycle
Average commute34.8 min — more favorable39.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.144.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4102024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.911.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.9%77.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.8%71.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility20.4%11.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Maryland and New York do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Crofton

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Massapequa

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Crofton
—
Crofton: Your Score
78
Area Score
Massapequa
—
Massapequa: Your Score
78
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Crofton, MD · Massapequa, NY · How this is calculated: methodology