Country Club Hills vs Midlothian

Which is the better fit for you?

Country Club Hills, IL
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally
Midlothian, IL
44
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Midlothian receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Country Club Hills to Midlothian

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$777 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,460 in Midlothian against $2,237 in Country Club Hills.
The median home
8% more
$207,000 in Midlothian against $192,000 in Country Club Hills.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Midlothian against 19°F in Country Club Hills; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Country Club Hills
Midlothian
Opportunity: Country Club Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
34 · Bottom 10%
vs
30 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Country Club Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
13 · Bottom 2%
vs
12 · Bottom 1%
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
69 · Top 38%
Housing affordability
45 · Bottom 15%
vs
45 · Bottom 15%
Schools: Midlothian is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
13 · Bottom 5%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access: Country Club Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 44%
vs
93 · Top 48%
Economic stability: Midlothian is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
51 · Bottom 37%
vs
59 · Top 48%

Measured values

MetricCountry Club HillsMidlothianSource period
Population16,32413,9482024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,197 ±$10,225$70,000 ±$11,4662024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,789 ±$5,631$35,437 ±$3,2322024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,285/sq mi4,948/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$192,000$207,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,709$1,249 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,237$1,460 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate74.0%75.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher29.7% — more favorable20.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.3% ±4%9.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.4%−66.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"34.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi16 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.4 min31.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.438.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools592024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.413.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency9.6%14.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency13.2%18.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility66.8%67.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Country Club Hills

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Midlothian

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Country Club Hills
—
Country Club Hills: Your Score
43
Area Score
Midlothian
—
Midlothian: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Country Club Hills, IL · Midlothian, IL · How this is calculated: methodology