Comstock Park vs Wyoming

Which is the better fit for you?

Comstock Park, MI
60
Area Score
Top 45% nationally
Wyoming, MI
58
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Comstock Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Comstock Park to Wyoming

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.0 against 95.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,531 in Wyoming against $1,531 in Comstock Park.
The median home
4% less
$225,200 in Wyoming against $235,300 in Comstock Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Wyoming against 19°F in Comstock Park; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Comstock Park
Wyoming
Opportunity: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
33 · Bottom 9%
vs
37 · Bottom 13%
Growth: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
50 · Bottom 48%
vs
52 · Top 47%
Climate
62 · Bottom 22%
vs
62 · Bottom 22%
Physical resilience
94 · Top 6%
vs
94 · Top 6%
Housing affordability: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 45%
vs
70 · Top 39%
Schools: Comstock Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
22 · Bottom 15%
Access: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 32%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Wyoming is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
60 · Top 46%
vs
64 · Top 38%

Measured values

MetricComstock ParkWyomingSource period
Population10,57777,3532024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$59,984$73,677 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$33,564 ±$2,761$35,346 ±$1,9232024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,727/sq mi3,127/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$235,300$225,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,189 ±$48$1,196 ±$342024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,531$1,531FY2026
Cost of living index95.095.02023
Homeownership rate48.7%67.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%4.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−5.9%−5.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate26.0% ±4%25.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.6% ±4%10.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,32132612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.54.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+20.4%+31.5% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.4"39.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate22.6 min ±1.7 min22.6 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.734.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6302024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.1 — more favorable16.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency35.4% — more favorable23.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.6% — more favorable35.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility55.8%84.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Comstock Park
—
Comstock Park: Your Score
60
Area Score
Wyoming
—
Wyoming: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Comstock Park, MI · Wyoming, MI · How this is calculated: methodology