Columbine vs Newcastle

Which is the better fit for you?

Columbine, CO
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Newcastle, WA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Newcastle receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Columbine to Newcastle

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
7% higher
Regional price level 112.7 against 105.8 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$479 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,568 in Newcastle against $2,089 in Columbine.
The median home
95% more
$1,205,600 in Newcastle against $617,200 in Columbine.
The weather you would swap
Winters 18°F milder
Normal January lows are 37°F in Newcastle against 19°F in Columbine; July highs are 77°F against 87°F (summers 10°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Columbine
Newcastle
Opportunity: Columbine is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 44%
vs
53 · Bottom 43%
Growth: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
29 · Bottom 14%
vs
34 · Bottom 20%
Climate: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
35 · Bottom 27%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Housing affordability: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
30 · Bottom 3%
vs
48 · Bottom 19%
Schools: Columbine is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
62 · Top 34%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: Columbine is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Columbine is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
78 · Top 8%
vs
72 · Top 19%

Measured values

MetricColumbineNewcastleSource period
Population25,47812,9892024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$131,232$160,278 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$59,385$91,506 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,841/sq mi2,929/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$617,200$1,205,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,448 ±$244$2,369 ±$662024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,089 — more favorable$2,568FY2026
Cost of living index105.8 — more favorable112.72023
Homeownership rate89.3%61.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable4.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%−1.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher53.2%68.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.5% ±1%3.9% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)9883312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.72.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.3%−59.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation15.0"34.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi6 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.5 min ±1.4 min30.1 min ±2.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.637.52024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher17.4 — more favorable18.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency44.8%58.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency58.7%70.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Colorado and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Columbine

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado, wildfire.

Newcastle

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Columbine
—
Columbine: Your Score
51
Area Score
Newcastle
—
Newcastle: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Columbine, CO · Newcastle, WA · How this is calculated: methodology