Coconut Creek vs Oakland Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Coconut Creek, FL
45
Area Score
Bottom 9% nationally
Oakland Park, FL
44
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Coconut Creek receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Coconut Creek to Oakland Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.1 against 112.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$361 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,268 in Oakland Park against $2,629 in Coconut Creek.
The median home
24% more
$385,000 in Oakland Park against $309,600 in Coconut Creek.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 59°F in Oakland Park against 60°F in Coconut Creek; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Coconut Creek
Oakland Park
Opportunity: Coconut Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
47 · Bottom 30%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%
Growth: Oakland Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 7%
vs
35 · Bottom 21%
Climate: Coconut Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
82 · Top 12%
vs
81 · Top 14%
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 14%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Housing affordability: Coconut Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
55 · Bottom 28%
vs
47 · Bottom 18%
Schools: Coconut Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
24 · Bottom 17%
vs
15 · Bottom 7%
Access: Oakland Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 32%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability
60 · Top 46%
vs
60 · Top 46%

Measured values

MetricCoconut CreekOakland ParkSource period
Population58,33044,6822024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,014 ±$4,945$72,708 ±$4,2462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$47,024 ±$13,351$39,645 ±$3,1842024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,219/sq mi5,958/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$309,600$385,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,102$1,804 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,629$2,268 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.1112.12023
Homeownership rate64.8%58.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.5%−1.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher38.9% — more favorable27.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.7% ±2%12.0% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)03412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−100.0%−22.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low60°F59°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation55.6"56.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.7 min27.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.538.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools682024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.620.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.8% — more favorable46.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.5% — more favorable48.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility36.2%38.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Coconut Creek

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Oakland Park

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Coconut Creek
—
Coconut Creek: Your Score
45
Area Score
Oakland Park
—
Oakland Park: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Coconut Creek, FL · Oakland Park, FL · How this is calculated: methodology