Coalinga vs Madera

Which is the better fit for you?

Coalinga, CA
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally
Madera, CA
35
Area Score
Bottom 1% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Coalinga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Coalinga to Madera

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 104.0 against 104.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$288 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,376 in Madera against $1,664 in Coalinga.
The median home
37% more
$359,900 in Madera against $262,400 in Coalinga.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 39°F in Madera against 37°F in Coalinga; July highs are 98°F against 98°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Coalinga
Madera
Opportunity: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
40 · Bottom 18%
vs
30 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Madera is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
36 · Bottom 23%
vs
47 · Bottom 42%
Climate: Madera is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
69 · Bottom 45%
vs
70 · Bottom 47%
Physical resilience: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
13 · Bottom 9%
vs
4 · Bottom 1%
Housing affordability: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 3%
vs
46 · Bottom 16%
Schools: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
11 · Bottom 4%
vs
10 · Bottom 3%
Access: Madera is the more favorable of the two.
Access
67 · Bottom 9%
vs
86 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability: Madera is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
28 · Bottom 8%
vs
33 · Bottom 12%

Measured values

MetricCoalingaMaderaSource period
Population17,20367,8312024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,451 ±$15,064$63,933 ±$4,7432024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$24,315 ±$2,400$24,200 ±$2,6672024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,561/sq mi3,442/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$262,400$359,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,093 — more favorable$1,3532024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,664$1,376 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index104.0104.02023
Homeownership rate53.6%54.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate7.7%7.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4% — more favorable−1.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate12.7% ±3%10.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate23.2% ±6%25.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)812312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.51.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+300.0%−7.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F39°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation7.2"10.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport56 mi24 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.0 min — more favorable27.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.530.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8152024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.919.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency18.8%21.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.2% — more favorable39.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility76.8%88.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Coalinga

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake, wildfire.

Madera

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire, heat wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Coalinga
—
Coalinga: Your Score
42
Area Score
Madera
—
Madera: Your Score
35
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Coalinga, CA · Madera, CA · How this is calculated: methodology