Coalinga vs Exeter

Which is the better fit for you?

Coalinga, CA
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally
Exeter, CA
44
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Exeter receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Coalinga to Exeter

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% lower
Regional price level 101.5 against 104.0 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$190 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,474 in Exeter against $1,664 in Coalinga.
The median home
17% more
$307,600 in Exeter against $262,400 in Coalinga.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Exeter against 37°F in Coalinga; July highs are 98°F against 98°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

35 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Coalinga
Exeter
Opportunity: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
40 · Bottom 18%
vs
31 · Bottom 7%
Growth: Exeter is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
36 · Bottom 23%
vs
54 · Top 41%
Climate
69 · Bottom 45%
vs
69 · Bottom 45%
Physical resilience: Exeter is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
13 · Bottom 9%
vs
15 · Bottom 10%
Housing affordability: Coalinga is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 3%
vs
77 · Top 20%
Schools: Exeter is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
11 · Bottom 4%
vs
24 · Bottom 18%
Access: Exeter is the more favorable of the two.
Access
67 · Bottom 9%
vs
72 · Bottom 13%
Economic stability: Exeter is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
28 · Bottom 8%
vs
40 · Bottom 21%

Measured values

MetricCoalingaExeterSource period
Population17,20310,2582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,451 ±$15,064$75,769 ±$10,5472024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$24,315$35,768 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,561/sq mi4,140/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$262,400$307,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,093 — more favorable$1,2862024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,664$1,474 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index104.0101.5 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate53.6%54.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate7.7% — more favorable10.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4% — more favorable−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate12.7% ±3%13.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate23.2%14.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)82,01512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.54.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+300.0%+36.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation7.2"8.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport56 mi46 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.0 min ±2.6 min23.0 min ±2.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.534.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools862024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.9 — more favorable21.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency18.8%30.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.2%48.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility76.8%74.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Coalinga

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake, wildfire.

Exeter

Elevated or high exposure: heat wave, inland flooding, wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Coalinga
—
Coalinga: Your Score
42
Area Score
Exeter
—
Exeter: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Coalinga, CA · Exeter, CA · How this is calculated: methodology