Cleburne vs Taylor

Which is the better fit for you?

Cleburne, TX
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally
Taylor, TX
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Taylor receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cleburne to Taylor

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 98.3 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$302 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,852 in Taylor against $1,550 in Cleburne.
The median home
29% more
$285,800 in Taylor against $221,100 in Cleburne.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F milder
Normal January lows are 42°F in Taylor against 33°F in Cleburne; July highs are 97°F against 95°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Cleburne
Taylor
Opportunity: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 33%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth: Cleburne is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
62 · Top 26%
Climate: Cleburne is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 42%
vs
67 · Bottom 39%
Physical resilience: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
73 · Top 33%
vs
86 · Top 15%
Housing affordability: Cleburne is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 45%
vs
67 · Top 48%
Schools: Cleburne is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
22 · Bottom 15%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Access
78 · Bottom 19%
vs
84 · Bottom 27%
Economic stability: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
59 · Top 49%

Measured values

MetricCleburneTaylorSource period
Population34,34417,1362024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$70,656 ±$6,987$75,508 ±$5,9322024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$32,059$36,996 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,035/sq mi757/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$221,100$285,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,322 ±$44$1,074 ±$2452024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,550 — more favorable$1,852FY2026
Cost of living index102.598.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate60.4%74.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%4.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.3%+0.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate20.3% ±2%20.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.1% ±3%7.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5519012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents16.0 — more favorable5.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−8.6%−37.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F97°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F42°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.7"36.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport43 mi30 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.6 min — more favorable33.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.041.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1162024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.5 — more favorable13.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency35.9% — more favorable31.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency35.5%37.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility70.4%68.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cleburne

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

Taylor

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cleburne
—
Cleburne: Your Score
63
Area Score
Taylor
—
Taylor: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cleburne, TX · Taylor, TX · How this is calculated: methodology